Step 1

In this project, you will aid Vice President Dodger of Colossal Corporation by analyzing complicated issues that have arisen in different subsidiaries of the company. These situations require the company to make legal and ethical decisions. You will be presented with a number of readings to familiarize yourself with relevant laws and with resources that guide you in making ethical decisions. You will produce a report for the VP that includes specific recommendations based on what you have found in the readings and will engage in a discussion on international legal challenges.

Begin in Step 1, where you will review the first case.

Step 2 : Review Turnip Plaza Hotel Case 

Invigorated by your early success at Colossal Corporation, you open The Turnip Plaza Hotel case file Kenneth Dodger has provided to you. In the next step, you will gather the information you need to write the report.

Step 3: Gather and Analyze Information 


From: Kenneth Dodger, Vice President, Colossal Corporation

To: You

Good morning,

Hope you’ve had time to review the case file on The Turnip Plaza Hotel. In order to formulate a sound response to my questions, you’ll need to review a number of specific foundational issues involving legal contracts.

First, find the necessary information about contract formation and execution. Then, look into possible contract remedies for when a breach of contract occurs. As you read over this information, be sure to record your thoughts pertaining to the case, while noting the places in the readings that prompted your thoughts.

After you have refreshed your understanding of contract law generally, you should supplement that understanding by doing legal research on specific laws related to contracts in Michigan. Again, make sure to take notes as you read. Good notes will help you write your report.

Thinking over this case, put some of your focus on Edward Griffin’s role in this situation with Mark Piper. More specifically, consider whether Edward had the authority to make the promise he made (or any promises) to Mark.

Review the legal responsibilities of agents and employees to help formulate your answer. You should also review ethical business decision making, as it pertains to keeping promises in business situations and the ethical questions I have asked you to consider.

I trust you to perform with the same tenacity as you did with the first cases.



In the next step, you will use what you have learned to create an outline that will prepare you to write the report.

Step 4: Focus on Your Rationale and Conclusions: Create Your Outline 

You’ve finished your research and reflected on how the facts and the law come together in this situation. You’ve also analyzed the possible arguments and determined which seem most reasonable (all things considered). Now it is time to formulate them, making sure to address all the concerns that VP Dodger expressed to you when you met. Outline the report that you will draft for your VP and review your document to make certain it covers all relevant points and progresses in a logical order.

After you finish the outline, if you have time, give yourself one night of sleep before you begin the next step, in which you will write the report. Fresh eyes might help you see points that need revision.

Step 5: Communicate Your Findings and Conclusions to the VP: Create Your Report 

Use your outline and research notes to prepare your report for the VP. Be sure to meet the following requirements he has requested:

  • Format your report by including APA-formatted in-text citations and an APA-formatted reference list (do not format the body of the report using APA style, just the reference list). See references and citations for details.
  • Include a specific recommendation of what action, if any, the VP should take based on your analysis and conclusions.
  • Support your conclusion with references to legal principles and laws.
  • The report should be no more than 10 pages (double spaced, 12-point font; the reference list does not count towards page limit).
  • Title your file using this protocol: yourlastname_TurnipPlazaReport_date.

Submit your Turnip Plaza report to the Assignments folder. You should try to have this report complete by the end of Week 4.

In the next step, you will begin work on navigating some of the international legal challenges Colossal is facing.

Step 6: Review Colossal’s International Legal Challenges 

Successfully completing the Turnip Plaza report, you’re ready to review your next assignment: the International Legal Challenges case file.

You open the file and read over the specifics of this situation. You soon see that VP Dodger is concerned about some of the risks involved with a number of Colossal’s international projects.

In the next step, you will gather the information you need to identify important issues for the VP.

Step 7: Gather and Analyze the Information 

While you have some general awareness that there are many ramifications of international transactions from a legal perspective, including dispute resolution provisions, you realize that you need to know a lot more about this subject before you can attempt to respond to the VP’s questions.

You begin by researching international law, international contracts, an introduction to alternative dispute resolution, and international dispute resolution.

Step 8: Engage in the International Legal Challenges Discussion 


Now that you’ve gathered and analyzed information on the International LegalChallenges case file, Vice President Dodger would like you to discuss your thoughts with the other members of his special investigations team. He sends you two requirements for this discussion:

First, each participant is to post an initial response to at least two of the five questions noted in the International Legal Challenges file. This should be completed during Week 5 and should meet the following requirements:

  • Include a specific recommendation of what action, if any, the VP should take based on your analysis and conclusions.
  • Support your conclusion with references to legal principles and laws.
  • These posts can be as long or as short as you need in order to effectively make your points.

Second, each participant must provide a substantive response to at least one posting from a colleague in the discussion, critiquing the initial post by appealing to legal and business considerations.